Merlog
Become a Contributor

← Beyond Kollywood: Why Nepal's Documentary Filmmakers Keep Reaching Global Festivals

Beyond Kollywood: Why Nepal's Documentary Filmmakers Keep Reaching Global Festivals

Ask most people outside Nepal to name a Nepali film and, if they can name one at all, it’s likely to be a Kollywood commercial release — the Kathmandu-based industry that produces the song-and-dance dramas that dominate Nepal’s own box office. What gets much less attention, including inside Nepal, is that the country’s strongest track record on the international festival circuit hasn’t come from Kollywood at all. It’s come from documentary and observational nonfiction filmmaking, made on a fraction of the budget, by a much smaller group of directors.

A track record built one film at a time

Deepak Rauniyar’s White Sun (Seto Surya), a fiction feature rather than a documentary but shot with a documentary sensibility about a family divided by Nepal’s civil war, premiered in the Venice Days sidecar of the Venice Film Festival in 2016 and went on to become Nepal’s official submission for the Academy Award for Best International Feature. It’s frequently cited as the moment international festival programmers started actively looking for Nepali work rather than encountering it by accident.

On the documentary side specifically, Kesang Tseten has spent over two decades building a body of work — following Nepali migrant laborers, Gurkha recruits, and Kathmandu’s changing urban life — that’s screened at festivals across Asia, Europe and North America with little of the marketing infrastructure a commercial release would have behind it. His films tend to observe rather than narrate, following subjects over long periods rather than building toward a conventional dramatic arc, an approach that has proven to travel well internationally even though it isn’t what draws a crowd to a multiplex in Kathmandu.

Why the gap exists

The honest explanation isn’t that Nepali documentary filmmakers are more talented than the country’s commercial industry — it’s that they’re solving a different problem. Kollywood exists to fill Nepali cinema halls, which means its incentives point toward music, romance and broadly familiar genre structures that travel poorly outside a Nepali-speaking audience. Documentary work, by contrast, is funded and distributed through an entirely different international ecosystem — festival grants, co-production funds, broadcaster pre-sales — that rewards exactly the kind of specific, close-observed, subtitled storytelling that a commercial industry has no reason to make.

That’s not a knock on Kollywood, which is doing what a domestic commercial industry is supposed to do. It’s a reminder that “Nepali cinema” isn’t one thing with one audience, and that the version of it winning festival attention abroad and the version filling seats in Kathmandu on a Friday night are, for now, mostly two separate industries working in parallel rather than one industry with two audiences.

0 people have cheered this entry 0 comments